Approved behavior baselines
Each robot keeps its own profile, capabilities, tools, zones, tolerances and approved behavior. Runtime drift does not silently become the new truth.
TTAN.IO Robotics Security
Robot security.
AI optional.
A deterministic security and runtime-assurance layer for industrial robots — traditional or AI-enabled — that validates physical intent before execution and verifies what actually happened afterwards.
AI recommends. Security decides.
Connectivity is not authority.
Human-first by design.
Physical action boundary
Intent becomes action only after proof.
Normalize intent
Validate robot + baseline
Check execution readiness
Bind the exact command
Observe + reconcile
An authenticated source, an AI output or an available robot is never physical authority by itself.
What we are
Robotics cybersecurity — not an AI control product.
TTAN.IO Robotics works when there is no model, no agent and no LLM anywhere in the path. HMI, MES, PLC, operator workflows and traditional robot programs can use the same security boundary.
When AI is present, it may interpret, correlate, explain and recommend. It cannot silently widen a robot capability, promote a new production behavior or release a physical action.
The model may suggest the work. The architecture governs whether that physical work is admissible now.
How TTAN.IO integrates
Keep your robotics stack. Add the physical-action security boundary.
TTAN.IO is designed to work with ROS 2, DDS, PLC/MES, HMI, vendor controllers, safety systems, AI services and non-ROS platforms without replacing the controls already protecting the plant.
Mode 01 · Observation-only
See what happened without taking command authority.
Collect controller, ROS/DDS, PLC, sensor, network and provider evidence. Build baselines, reconcile outcomes and investigate anomalies while TTAN.IO remains outside the privileged command path.
Explore observation mode → Mode 02 · Governed dispatchValidate the exact physical action before the existing controller executes it.
Normalize the request, validate identity and approved behavior, check current readiness, bind authority to the exact command, then use the existing provider/controller path without weakening DDS, safety or vendor controls.
Explore governed dispatch →ROS/DDS identity stays identity. Safety stays safety. Vendor control stays vendor control. TTAN.IO adds the cybersecurity boundary between digital intent and physical consequence.
What makes TTAN.IO Robotics different
Security around physical consequence.
We protect more than network access. TTAN.IO reasons about the robot, its approved behavior, the exact requested action, the current production state and the evidence returned after execution.
Exact command binding
Authority is bound to the exact normalized command. Change the robot, target, tool, zone, action or limit and the old authority no longer applies.
Anti-bypass + anti-replay
Connectivity, provider access or a valid identity does not create execution authority. One-shot authorization and replay controls protect privileged dispatch paths.
Runtime reconciliation
TTAN.IO compares expected, requested, authorized, executed and observed state. Missing or conflicting evidence cannot become verified success.
Production-line integrity
Security operates per robot and across cell, line and production sequence. One compromised step can be evaluated for downstream production impact.
Safe HOLD and re-entry
Recovery is not automatic resume. Physical and logical state are captured, reconciled and revalidated before a controlled return to service.
Vendor-neutral security semantics
ROS 2, DDS, PLC/MES, vendor APIs, simulators and future providers can change without changing the security meaning of the mission.
Multi-source telemetry
Controller, ROS, sensors, PLC, vision, network and provider telemetry can be correlated. A single reporting source is not automatically trusted.
Evidence by design
Request, approval, baseline, command binding, dispatch, observation, deviation and recovery evidence stay attributable to the affected robot and production context.
Small, medium and enterprise operations
Start with the robots you actually have.
The same per-robot identity and security model can start at one bounded cell and expand into line and plant context. Small companies should not need enterprise-scale complexity just to secure five robots.
5
Small operation
Start with one robot family or one production cell. Define individual profiles, approved behavior, bounded command paths and evidence without redesigning the plant.
50–100
Growing production
Preserve per-robot attribution while adding line sequencing, capability assignment, shared policy and centralized observation across multiple cells.
1,000+
Enterprise fleet target
Carry the same security semantics across plants, providers and robot types while keeping identity and baselines granular instead of collapsing everything into one generic fleet policy.
Large-fleet horizontal scale is an architectural deployment target. Current TTAN.IO Robotics status remains pre-production/laboratory and does not claim 1,000+ physical-production validation today.
Respecting the existing security market
Built to complement, not replace.
Robotics security is a system problem. Mature controls already protect important layers. TTAN.IO adds the governed boundary between digital intent and physical consequence.
Functional safety
E-stop, safety PLC, interlocks, scanners, light curtains and certified safety controllers protect people and machinery.
Keep it
OT / CPS security
Asset visibility, vulnerability management, network monitoring and threat detection remain essential across the industrial environment.
Keep it
Robot endpoint security
Hardening, firewalling, malware protection, logging and endpoint controls protect the robot controller and operating environment.
Keep it
ROS / DDS Security
Authentication, permissions, encryption and middleware trust protect participants and communications.
Keep it
TTAN.IO Robotics
Cross-layer robotics cybersecurity for physical action — connecting identity and trust context, approved behavior, exact command authority, anti-bypass, runtime verification, recovery and attributable evidence. Designed to support readiness for the CRA, Machinery Regulation and applicable AI Act / NIS2 obligations.
Explore cybersecurity layer + EU regulatory readiness →
An authenticated robot command can still be the wrong physical command. TTAN.IO is designed to answer the next question: should this exact robot perform this exact action, in this exact context, now?
Observe what really happened
Do not trust the command. Do not trust the report.
Runtime assurance correlates independent evidence so that a successful API response, controller message or model output cannot become proof by itself.
EXPECTEDApproved robot profile, production baseline and allowed sequence.
REQUESTEDWhat the operator, HMI, PLC, application, planner or AI asked for.
AUTHORIZEDWhat policy and current state actually permitted.
EXECUTEDWhat reached the privileged provider/controller path.
OBSERVEDWhat controller, robot, sensors, PLC and independent telemetry report.
RECONCILEDWhether the physical and logical outcome matches the authorized effect.
Human-first governance
Automation without surrendering authority.
AI is advisory
AI can interpret, correlate and recommend, but it never inherits command authority. Every physical action still passes deterministic security validation.
Read how it works →HUMAN_REQUIRED is first-class
Ambiguous, high-risk or recovery conditions can stop the workflow and require a real human decision bound to the exact operation.
Read how it works →No silent self-learning in production
Observed drift or AI-proposed capability expansion can be analyzed, but cannot silently rewrite the approved production baseline.
Read how it works →No automatic restart after uncertainty
HOLD stays meaningful. Physical and logical state must be reconciled, eligibility restored and fresh authority issued before resuming.
Read how it works →Compliance-aware engineering
Evidence for the rules that apply to your robots.
TTAN.IO Robotics is designed to coexist with safety and cybersecurity obligations instead of turning standards into marketing badges.
ISO 10218-1:2025
ISO 10218-2:2025
ISO/TS 15066
IEC 62443
EU Machinery Regulation
EU Cyber Resilience Act
EU AI Act — where applicable
NIS2 — where applicable
DDS Security / ROS 2 Security
Safety remains safety. TTAN.IO does not replace certified functional-safety systems, safety PLCs, emergency stops, vendor safety controllers or the machinery risk assessment.
Cyber evidence remains attributable. Baseline versions, request/approval lineage, command bindings, deviations, observations and recovery records are designed to support auditable security governance.
Transparent about what is real.
Current status: the Phase 1 software/security foundation is closed and Phase 2 laboratory/provider evidence is active. TTAN.IO Robotics is not yet safety-certified, production-authorized or claiming real physical-production authority. Simulation and planning evidence are not presented as physical proof.
Start with one bounded robotics problem.
One cell. One robot family. One approved workflow. Then expand the security model as the operation grows — without making AI, a vendor cloud or a generic network connection the authority for physical work.
Talk to Luna about a Robotics test→